<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony&#8217;s “the First Hit is Always Free”&#160;DSLR&#160;Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noah.aboussafy.com/technology/sonys-dslr-strategy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noah.aboussafy.com/technology/sonys-dslr-strategy</link>
	<description>The Public Writings of Noah Aboussafy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://noah.aboussafy.com/technology/sonys-dslr-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noah.aboussafy.com/?p=450#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Oh don&#039;t get me wrong by the way, I&#039;m not saying in body image stabilization is better, it&#039;s just advantagous from this perspective. In reality putting the IS system into the lens allows the system to be tailored to the optical qualities of the lens as well as it&#039;s price range. Putting it in the body pretty much means it&#039;s stuck with a generalization and a price point matched to the camera, or worse the base model of the line. Also I&#039;d point out that technically it&#039;s possible to build a camera that supports both, I don&#039;t know if anyone does, but that&#039;d be pretty great if they didn&#039;t interfere with each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh don&#8217;t get me wrong by the way, I&#8217;m not saying in body image stabilization is better, it&#8217;s just advantagous from this perspective. In reality putting the IS system into the lens allows the system to be tailored to the optical qualities of the lens as well as it&#8217;s price range. Putting it in the body pretty much means it&#8217;s stuck with a generalization and a price point matched to the camera, or worse the base model of the line. Also I&#8217;d point out that technically it&#8217;s possible to build a camera that supports both, I don&#8217;t know if anyone does, but that&#8217;d be pretty great if they didn&#8217;t interfere with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

